|
|
SUMARRY: Time travel: The mystery of 1,000 years. Technically Time Travel already exists. For instance, take the stars you look at every night. They are a number of light years away, correct? YES! So, take the star Proxima Centuri, 4.5 light years away. Let X equal the number of years you are looking back in time, and let D equal how many light years a star is away. With this, the equation X=D. I have my own computation for time travel, but first there are two components that make up this theory. In my first two years of research, I read a lot of books on Einstein and Relativity: E=MC2. E=MC2 is a large part of my calculation, as well as Asimov�s theory 2pi times the square root of mass divided by kinetic energy. After spending the third and fourth year of my research I composed the equation: Y�((p�M/K)+((-M*9.8+U)+U)K)=T (m=mass, and k=speed u=momentum W = force against you Y=present year T=year of arrival) The point of this equation shows where you will end up in time. Anyway, in the 5th year of my research I found a theory that agrees with the Time Stream, and Big Bang-Big Crash theories. First: Schreckenberger�s Law: For every jump through time there is an equal action in the future and an opposite action/reaction sequence in the past. For example, take a quarter. If you go to the future, you�ll find the same quarter from the time you came from (present), and you�ll have the same one you brought to the future. The present will have become the past, causing the coin to disappear from the past to the time in which you are. If you go to the past, the future from the present remains unchanged, but the past to the present (now future) is effected by the coin�s presence (action sequence). What is the different between action and reaction sequence: An action sequence is when you add, a reaction is when you subtract or repel. This is a sum up of 5 years of research on the subject of time travel. I give credit to Einstein and Isaac Asimov for basing my theory. Within the next 30 years I hope to build this portal through time. It may come sooner than you think. The equation Y�((p�M/K)+((-M*9.8+U)+U)K)=T also has a discriminant. This is called the Timimetric Discriminant Factor. It is: ((p�M/K)+((-M*9.8+U)+U)K) Suppose M=150, K=5, and U=750; the result is about 169. The number that results would be labeled X cliks or in this case 169 cliks. Cliks are the yearly terms used to measure the time stream velocity of the jump. If the Timimetric Discriminant Factor is positive the jump is possible, if it is negative the jump is impossible, and if it is zero, it is still considered possible, but calculations have to be exact. This rule will be called the Timimetric Property. (The short form of clik is Clx)
THESIS: In the first year of study I used various resources to study Einstein�s famous Relativity. E=MC2 means that the energy output equals the objects mass multiplied by the speed of light squared. This played an important role in my first equation: ((2pk)+(2.44e12*k)+(c^2k))k; of course, this equation soon evolved after I studied Asimov�s 2p Theory. This is (2p�M/K)/2. This soon changed 2pk to p�M/K. These two scientists� theories were the foundations for my research. Newton, as well, contributed. His Law of Motion: For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction set the standard for Schreckenberger�s Law: Equal Action in the future, opposite action/reaction sequence in the past. It took me into my third year to come up with the PFP Effect, a rare, and almost unbelievable statement that says our actions are predestined. Even if we came to a decision that involved several choices, those choices are previously mapped out by time itself. The only way you can find this theory to be true is if you step outside from the �normal� boundaries. The fourth year of my research was definitely focused around one thing, mathematical equations. In the last few months my equation jumped from something like completing the square to the Quadratic Formula. A new effect that I termed, the Grandma Effect is something to be considered. If I were to go back into time and marry your dad�s mom, before his dad did, then theoretically speaking your dad wouldn�t exist and neither would you. Everyone would forget your existence. The choices you made would be eliminated and the time stream would once again give people a destined path. Jumping into past is more dangerous than jumping into the future. If you go to the past then you can mess a lot of people up. That, however, hasn�t happened because we have no recollection of it. So, until someone warps our memory in the past, we can continue to live on the destined track. My last theory to be discovered is the FPF Effect: It is sort of like the PFP, except it means that someone from the future altered the past, the time stream compensated by altering everything from that point on. We�d have no idea of this change, because we�d believe the change was already in existence. Then another time traveler finds the mistake of the altering of the past and fixes it, setting the present and the future in its previous track. In other words something in the future alters the past and future, but then it is reversed. Now if the PFP Effect is true, we�ll believe that time was still predestined through all of this chaos because we will be unaware of the changes made. Out of all of this I find Schreckenberger�s Law and the Grandma Effect to be true PFP and FPF work together, however, I wouldn�t count on a young person understanding what that means. The reason why any alterations made in the past won�t disprove the PFP is because to us the changes made would be the way life was for hundreds or even thousands of years. I shall continue my research and someday I hope to visit many historical areas. The question is not where but when.
Here�s is the first section of my Timimetric Periodic Table. Mass is in kilograms and Speed is measured in Km/h. There are many more velocities that are listed in the full version, but it is 3 pages so I transferred it to a spread sheet. Remember cliks are the units used to measure the yearly velocity of a time stream jump. I�d like to offer you, the reader, a proposition. Study these theories, try to confirm or disprove them. Email me at USX1@juno.com with questions or comments. Even if these theories don�t work, a failure still advances science. Thanks, and have a nice day. |